Fiedler, K., Kliegl, R., Lindenberger, U., Mausfeld, R., Mummendey, A., & Prinz, W. (2005). Psychologie im 21. Jahrhundert: Führende deutsche Psychologen über Lage und Zukunft ihres Fachs und die Rolle der psychologischen Grundlagenforschung. Gehirn & Geist, (7-8), 56–60.

Fischer, H., Sandblom, J., Gavazzeni, J., Fransson, P., Wright, C. I., & Bäckman, L. (2005). Age-differential patterns of brain activation during perception of angry faces. Neuroscience Letters, 386(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.06.002

Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., & Smirnov, O. (2005). Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishment. Nature, 433, E1–E1. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03256

Ghisletta, P., & Lindenberger, U. (2005). Exploring structural dynamics within and between sensory and intellectual functioning in old and very old age: Longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Intelligence, 33(6), 555–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.07.002

Gigerenzer, G. (2005). I think, therefore I err. Social Research, 72(1), 195–218.

Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Wie versteht man Risiken und Unsicherheiten? [How to understand risks and uncertainty]. HNO Informationen, (4), 287–294.

Gigerenzer, G., & Gigerenzer, T. (2005). Is the ultimatum game a three-body affair? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(6), 823–824.

Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Van den Broek, E., Fasolo, B., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2005). "A 30% chance of rain tomorrow": how does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis, 25(3), 623–629.

Grühn, D., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (2005). No aging bias favoring memory for positive material: evidence from a heterogeneity-homogeneity list paradigm using emotionally toned words. Psychology and Aging, 20(4), 579–588.

Hanoch, Y. (2005). One theory to fit them all: the search hypothesis of emotion revisited. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1093/phisci/axi107

Hardy, I., Schneider, M., Jonen, A., Stern, E., & Möller, K. (2005). Fostering diagrammatic reasoning in science education. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.64.3.207

Hertwig, R., Pachur, T., & Kurzenhäuser, S. (2005). Judgments of risk frequencies: Tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(4), 621–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.621

Hill, H., & Raab, M. (2005). Analyzing a complex visuomotor tracking task with brain-electrical event related potentials. Human Movement Science, 24(1), p. 1-p. 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2004.11.002

Hutchinson, J. M. C. (2005). Is more choice always desirable? evidence and arguments from leks, food selection, and environmental enrichment. Biological Reviews, 80(1), 73–92.

Hutchinson, J. M. C., & Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes, 69, 97–124.

Hutchinson, J. M. C., & Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Connecting behavioural biologists and psychologists: clarifying distinctions and suggestions for further work. Behavioural Processes, 69, 159–163.

Johnson, T., Myagkov, M., & Orbell, J. (2005). Sociality as a defensive response to the threat of loss. Politics and the Life Sciences, 23(2), 13–19.

Jürges, H., Schneider, K., & Büchel, F. (2005). The effect of central exit examinations on student achievement: Quasi-experimental evidence from TIMSS Germany. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(5), 1134–1155.

Kameda, T., Takezawa, M., & Hastie, R. (2005). Where do social norms come from: the example of communal sharing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), p. 331-p. 334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00392.x

Katsikopoulos, K., & Simsek, Ö. (2005). Optimal doubling strategy against a suboptimal opponent. Journal of Applied Probability, 42, 867–872.