Gigerenzer, G. (2017). Can search engine data save lives from pancreatic cancer? BMJ Opinion, June 6.

Gigerenzer, G. (2017). A theory integration program. Decision, 4(3), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000082

Gigerenzer, G. (2017). Can search engine data predict pancreatic cancer? BMJ, 358, Article j3159. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3159

Gigerenzer, G., & García-Retamero, R. (2017). Cassandra's regret: The psychology of not wanting to know. Psychological Review, 124(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000055

Gigerenzer, G., & Gray, W. D. (2017). A simple heuristic successfully used by humans, animals, and machines: The story of the RAF and Luftwaffe, hawks and ducks, dogs and frisbees, baseball outfielders and sidewinder missiles - oh my! Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(2), 260–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12269

Gigerenzer, G., & Kolpatzik, K. (2017). How new fact boxes are explaining medical risk to millions. BMJ, 357, Article j2460. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2460

Gigerenzer, G., & Kolpatzik, K. (2017). Authors' reply to Workman. BMJ, 358, Article j3281. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3281

Gleich, T., Lorenz, R. C., Gallinat, J., & Kühn, S. (2017). Functional changes in the reward circuit in response to gaming-related cues after training with a commercial video game. NeuroImage, 152, 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.032

Glowacki, L., & Molleman, L. (2017). Subsistence styles shape human social learning strategies. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article 0098. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0098

Grolig, L., Cohrdes, C., & Schroeder, S. (2017). Der Titelrekognitionstest für das Vorschulalter (TRT-VS): Erfassung des Lesevolumens von präkonventionellen Lesern und Zusammenhänge mit Vorläuferfertigkeiten des Lesens. Diagnostica, 63(4), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000186

Hanson, J. L., van den Bos, W., Roeber, B. J., Rudolph, K. D., Davidson, R. J., & Pollak, S. D. (2017). Early adversity and learning: Implications for typical and atypical behavioral development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(7), 770–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12694

Hasenäcker, J., & Schroeder, S. (2017). Syllables and morphemes in German reading development: Evidence from second graders, fourth graders and adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(3), 733–753. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000412

Hasenäcker, J., Schröter, P., & Schroeder, S. (2017). Investigating developmental trajectories of morphemes as reading units in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1093–1108. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000353

Hautz, W. E., Kämmer, J. E., Exadaktylos, A., & Hautz, S. C. (2017). How thinking about groups is different from groupthink. Medical Education, 51(2), 229–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13137

Heinzel, S., Lorenz, R. C., Duong, Q.-L., Rapp, M. A., & Deserno, L. (2017). Prefrontal-parietal effective connectivity during working memory in older adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 57, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.05.005

Hertwig, R. (2017). When to consider boosting: Some rules for policy-makers. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.14

Hertwig, R., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2017). Nudging and boosting: Steering or empowering good decisions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617702496

Hertzog, C., Lövdén, M., Lindenberger, U., & Schmiedek, F. (2017). Age differences in coupling of intraindividual variability in mnemonic strategies and practice-related associative recall improvements. Psychology and Aging, 32(6), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000177

Herzog, S. M., Lim, H. W., Williams, M. S., De Maddalena, I. D., Osterwalder, U., & Surber, C. (2017). Sun protection factor communication of sunscreen effectiveness: A web-based study of perception of effectiveness by dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology, 153(3), 348–350. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.4924

Hilbrand, S., Coall, D. A., Gerstorf, D., & Hertwig, R. (2017). Caregiving within and beyond the family is associated with lower mortality for the caregiver: A prospective study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(3), 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.11.010