Uğurlar, P., & Wulff, D. U. (2022). Self-concept clarity is associated with social decision making performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 197, Article 111783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111783

van Bree, S., Melcón, M., Kolibius, L. D., Kerrén, C., Wimber, M., & Hanslmayr, S. (2022). The brain time toolbox, a software library to retune electrophysiology data to brain dynamics. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 1430–1439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01386-8

Wegwarth, O., Ludwig, W.-D., Spies, C., Schulte, E., & Hertwig, R. (2022). The role of simulated-experience and descriptive formats on perceiving risks of strong opioids: A randomized controlled trial with chronic noncancer pain patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 105(6), 1571–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.002

Wegwarth, O., Spies, C., Ludwig, W.-D., Donner-Banzhoff, N., Jonitz, G., & Hertwig, R. (2022). Educating physicians on strong opioids by descriptive versus simulated-experience formats: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 22, Article 741. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03797-7

Woike, J. K., Hafenbrädl, S., Kanngiesser, P., & Hertwig, R. (2022). The transmission game: Testing behavioral interventions in a pandemic-like simulation. Science Advances, 8(8), Article eabk0428. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abk0428

Wolf, F., Lehmann, S., & Lorenz-Spreen, P. (2022). Successive cohorts of Twitter users show increasing activity and shrinking content horizons. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 2, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2022.014

Wu, C. M., Schulz, E., Pleskac, T. J., & Speekenbrink, M. (2022). Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 4122. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07901-1

Wulff, D. U., Aeschbach, S., De Deyne, S., & Mata, R. (2022). Data from the MySWOW proof-of-concept study: Linking individual semantic networks and cognitive performance. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 10(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.55

Wulff, D. U., De Deyne, S., Aeschbach, S., & Mata, R. (2022). Using network science to understand the aging lexicon: Linking individuals' experience, semantic networks, and cognitive performance. Topics in Cognitive Science, 14(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12586

Wulff, D. U., Hills, T. T., & Mata, R. (2022). Structural differences in the semantic networks of younger and older adults. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 21459 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11698-4

Wulff, D. U., & Mata, R. (2022). On the semantic representation of risk. Science Advances, 8(27), Article eabm1883. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abm1883

Zacharopoulos, G., Hertz, U., Kanai, R., & Bahrami, B. (2022). The effect of feedback valence and source on perception and metacognition: An fMRI investigation. Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(1), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2020.1828323

Zilker, V. (2022). Stronger attentional biases can be linked to higher reward rate in preferential choice. Cognition, 225, Article 105095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105095

Zilker, V. (2022). Choice rules can affect the informativeness of model comparisons. Computational Brain & Behavior, 5, 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-022-00142-5

Zilker, V., & Pachur, T. (2022). Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential sampling. Psychological Review, 129(5), 949–975. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000304

Zilker, V., & Pachur, T. (2022). Toward an attentional turn in research on risky choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 953008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.953008

Appelhoff, S., & Stenner, T. (2021). In COM we trust: Feasibility of USB-based event marking. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 2450–2455. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01571-z

Arslan, R. C., Driebe, J. C., Stern, J., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2021). The evidence for good genes ovulatory shifts in Arslan et al. (2018) is mixed and uncertain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(2), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000390

Arslan, R. C., Reitz, A. K., Driebe, J. C., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2021). Routinely randomize potential sources of measurement reactivity to estimate and adjust for biases in subjective reports. Psychological Methods, 26(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000294

Arslan, R. C., Schilling, K. M., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2021). Using 26,000 diary entries to show ovulatory changes in sexual desire and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(2), 410–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000208