Feltz, A., & Cokely, E. T. (2009). Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.08.001
Feltz, A., Cokely, E., & Nadelhoffer, T. (2009). Natural compatibilism versus natural incompatibilism: Back to the drawing board. Mind & Language, 24(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.01351.x
Straubinger, N., Cokely, E. T., & Stevens, J. R. (2009). The dynamics of development: Challenges for Bayesian rationality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(1), 103–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09000491
Cokely, E. T., Ghazal, S., & García-Retamero, R. (2014). Measuring numeracy. In B. L. Anderson & J. Schulkin (Eds.), Numerical reasoning in judgments and decision making about health (pp. 11–38). Cambridge University Press.
García-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2014). Using visual aids to help people with low numeracy make better decisions. In B. L. Anderson & J. Schulkin (Eds.), Numerical reasoning in judgments and decision making about health (pp. 153–174). Cambridge University Press.