Soltis, J., & McElreath, R. (2001). Can females gain extra paternal investment by mating with multiple males? A game theoretic approach. American Naturalist, 158(5), 519–529.

Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Shepard's mirrors or Simon's scissors? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(4), 704–705.

Vitouch, O. (2001). When your ear sets the stage: Musical context effects in film perception. Psychology of Music, 29, 70–83.

Barrett, H. C., & Fiddick, L. (2000). Evolution and risky decisions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(7), 251–254.

Brendgen, M., Little, T. D., & Krappmann, L. (2000). Rejected children and their friends: A shared evaluation of friendship quality? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46(1), 45–70.

Bullock, S., & Noble, J. (2000). Evolutionary simulation modelling clarifies interactions between parallel adaptive processes: Commentary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(1), 150–151.

Davis, J. N. (2000). A few tips on hypothesis testing. Behaviorial and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 600–601.

Fiddick, L. (2000). The content of their discontent: How do the folk interpret evolutionary psychology? Psychological Inquiry, 11(1), 26–29.

Fiddick, L., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). No interpretation without representation: The role of domain-specific representations and inferences in the Wason selection task. Cognition, 77(1), 1–79.

Fiedler, K., Schmid, J., Kurzenhäuser, S., & Schröter, V. (2000). Lie detection as an attribution process: The anchoring effect revisited. Hypnosis International Monographs, 4, 113–136.

Goodie, A. S., & Fantino, E. (2000). Representing the task in Bayesian reasoning: Comment on Lovett and Schunn (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(4), 449–452.

Harries, C., & Dhami, M. K. (2000). On the descriptive validity and prescriptive utility of fast and frugal models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 753–754.

Hertwig, R. (2000). The questionable utility of "cognitive ability" in explaining cognitive illusions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 678–679.

Hertwig, R., & Todd, P. M. (2000). Biases to the left, fallacies to the right: stuck in the middle with null hypothesis significance testing. Psycoloquy, 11, Article 28.

Hoffrage, U. (2000). Why the analysis of cognitive processes matters. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 679–680.

Hoffrage, U. (2000). Why the analyses of cognitive processes matter. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 679–680.

Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight bias: A by-product of knowledge updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 566–581.

Hoffrage, U., Kurzenhäuser, S., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Wie kann man die Bedeutung medizinischer Testbefunde besser verstehen und kommunizieren? [How to better understand and communicate medical test results]. Zeitschrift für Ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualitätssicherung, 94, 713–719.

Hoffrage, U., Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Communicating statistical information. Science, 290, 2261–2262.

Hutchinson, J. M. C. (2000). Three into two doesn't go: two-dimensional models of bird eggs, snail shells and plant roots. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 70(1), 161–187.