Starke, C., Ventura, A., Bersch, C., Cha, M., de Vreese, C., Doebler, P., Dong, M., Krämer, N., Leib, M., Peter, J., Schäfer, L., Soraperra, I., Szczuka, J., Tuchtfeld, E., Wald, R., & Köbis, N. (2024). Risks and protective measures for synthetic relationships. Nature Human Behaviour, 8, 1834–1836. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02005-4

Tsvetkova, M., Yasseri, T., Pescetelli, N., & Werner, T. (2024). A new sociology of humans and machines. Nature Human Behaviour, 8, 1864–1876. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02001-8

von Schenk, A., Klockmann, V., Bonnefon, J.-F., Rahwan, I., & Köbis, N. (2024). Lie detection algorithms disrupt the social dynamics of accusation behavior. iScience, 27(7), Article 110201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.110201

Vu, L., Molho, C., Soraperra, I., Fiedler, S., & Shalvi, S. (2024). Giving (in) to help an identified person. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 110, Article 104557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104557

Vu‑Han, T. L., Bermudez Schettino, R., Weiß, C., Perka, C., Winkler, T., Sunkara, V., & Pumberger, M. (2024). An interpretable data‑driven prediction model to anticipate scoliosis in spinal muscular atrophy in the era of (gene‑) therapies. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 11838. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62720-w

Yakura, H. (2024). Evaluating large language models’ ability using a psychiatric screening tool based on metaphor and sarcasm scenarios. Journal of Intelligence, 12(7), Article 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12070070

Yu, H., Zhou, Y., & Nussberger, A.-M. (2024). Gratitude is morally sensitive. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50(3), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221092273

Bersch, C., & Köbis, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) (and anti-corruption). In L. De Sousa & S. Coroado (Eds.), Elgar encyclopedia of corruption and society (pp. 17–22). Edward Elgar.

Dong, M. (2024). False moral superiority and heroism. In S. T. Allison, J. K. Beggan, & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Encyclopedia of heroism studies (pp. 585–588). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48129-1_243

Forjan, J., Köbis, N., & Starke, C. (2024). Artificial intelligence as a weapon to fight corruption: Civil society actors on the benefits and risks of existing bottom-up approaches. In A. Mattoni (Ed.), Digital media and grassroots anti-corruption: Contexts, platforms and data of anti-corruption technologies worldwide (pp. 229–249). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802202106.00020

Arakawa, R., & Yakura, H. (2024). Coaching copilot: Blended form of an LLM-powered chatbot and a human coach to effectively support self-reflection for leadership growth. In M. Dubiel & L. A. Leiva (Eds.), CUI '24: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3640794.3665549

Arakawa, R., Yakura, H., & Goel, M. (2024). PrISM-Observer: Intervention agent to help users perform everyday procedures sensed using a smartwatch. In L. Yao, M. Goel, A. Ion, & P. Lopes (Eds.), UIST '24: Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1145/3654777.3676350

Baumann, F., Halpern, D., Procaccia, A. D., Rahwan, I., Shapira, I., & Wüthrich, M. (2024). Optimal engagement-diversity tradeoffs in social media. In WWW '24: Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024 (pp. 288–299). https://doi.org/10.1145/3589334.3645713

Engelmann, N., Hannikainen, I. R., González-García, C., & Ruz, M. (2024). Understanding rule enforcement using drift diffusion models. In L. K. Samuelson, S. L. Frank, M. Toneva, A. Mackey, & E. Hazeltine (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 46, pp. 114–120). UC Merced.

Cordes, S., Dertwinkel-Kalt, M., & Werner, T. (2024). What drives demand for loot boxes? An experimental study (Discussion Paper / DFG Research Unit: "Consumer Preferences, Consumer Mistakes, and Firms' Response" (FOR 5392) No. 2024/05). Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE), DFG Research Unit: "Consumer Preferences, Consumer Mistakes, and Firms' Response" (FOR 5392).

Huelden, T., Jascisens, V., Roemheld, L., & Werner, T. (2024). Human-machine interactions in pricing: Evidence from two large-scale field experiments (DICE Discussion Paper No. 412). Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).

Awad, E., Yoeli, E., Rahwan, I., & Rahwan, Z. (2024). Heterogeneity in charitable giving preferences from over 2 million decisions worldwide. OSF Preprints, September 11, 2024. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/28g3z

Blonski, M., Eibelshäuser, S., Hegemann, H., Klockmann, V., & von Schenk, A. (2024). Human and algorithmic cooperation: Parameters matter! (Version posted online November 28, 2024). SSRN eLibrary, October 21, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4955708

Dong, M., Bonnefon, J.-F., & Rahwan, I. (2024). False consensus biases AI against vulnerable stakeholders. SSRN eLibrary, June 28, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4876227

Ferrari, A. E. V., Gupta, P., & Iqbal, N. (2024). Machine learning and optimization-based approaches to duality in statistical physics. arXiv, 2411.04838. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.04838