Adaptive Behavior and Cognition - Publications

Chater, N., Felin, T., Funder, D. C., Gigerenzer, G., Koenderink, J. J., Krueger, J. I. I., Noble, D., Nordli, S. A., Oaksford, M., Schwartz, B., Stanovich, K. E., & Todd, P. M. (2018). Mind, rationality, and cognition: An interdisciplinary debate. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(2), 793–826. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1333-5

Crupi, V., Nelson, J. D., Meder, B., Cevolani, G., & Tentori, K. (2018). Generalized information theory meets human cognition: Introducing a unified framework to model uncertainty and information search. Cognitive Science, 42(5), 1410–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12613

Fechner, H. B., Schooler, L. J., & Pachur, T. (2018). Cognitive costs of decision-making strategies: A resource demand decomposition with a cognitive architecture. Cognition, 170, 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.003

Gaissmaier, W., Giese, H., Galesic, M., Garcia-Retamero, R., Kasper, J., Kleiter, I., Meuth, S. G., Köpke, S., & Heesen, C. (2018). Numeracy of multiple sclerosis patients: A comparison of patients from the PERCEPT study to a German probabilistic sample. Patient Education and Counseling, 101(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.018

Galesic, M., Barkoczi, D., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2018). Smaller crowds outperform larger crowds and individuals in realistic task conditions. Decision, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000059

Galesic, M., Olsson, H., & Rieskamp, J. (2018). A sampling model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 125(3), 363–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000096

Galesic, M., Walkyria Goode, A., Wallsten, T. S., & Norman, K. L. (2018). Using Tversky's contrast model to investigate how features of similarity affect judgments of likelihood. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(2), 163–169.

Jarecki, J. B., Meder, B., & Nelson, J. D. (2018). Naïve and robust: Class-conditional independence in human classification learning. Cognitive Science, 42(1), 4–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12496

Katsikopoulos, K. V., Durbach, I. N., & Stewart, T. J. (2018). When should we use simple decision models? A synthesis of various research strands. Omega, 81, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.09.005

l'Haridon, O., Vieider, F. M., Aycinena, D., Bandur, A., Belianin, A., Cingl, L., Kothiyal, A., & Martinsson, P. (2018). Off the charts: Massive unexplained heterogeneity in a global study of ambiguity attitudes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(4), 664–677. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00724

McDowell, M., Galesic, M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2018). Natural frequencies do foster public understanding of medical tests: Comment on Pighin, Gonzales, Savadori and Girotto (2016). Medical Decision Making, 38(3), 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X18754508

Morais, A. S., & Hariskos, W. (2018). Academic coaching and decision analysis: Ways of deciding whether to pursue an academic career. PLoS ONE, 13(11), Article e0206961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206961

Motsch, S., Moussaïd, M., Guillot, E. G., Moreau, M., Pettré, J., Theraulaz, G., Appert-Rolland, C., & Degond, P. (2018). Modeling crowd dynamics through coarse-grained data analysis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 15(6), 1271–1290. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2018059

Okan, Y., Garcia-Retamero, R., Cokely, E. T., & Maldonado, A. (2018). Biasing and debiasing health decisions with bar graphs: Costs and benefits of graph literacy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(12), 2506–2519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817744546

Oztop, P., Katsikopoulos, K., & Gummerum, M. (2018). Creativity through connectedness: The role of closeness and perspective taking in group creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 30(3), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1488347

Petrova, D., & García-Retamero, R. (2018). Decisions about aneuploidy screening: why women's reasons are important. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 125(4), 460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15038

Petrova, D., & García-Retamero, R. (2018). Can we improve risk communication about non-invasive prenatal testing? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 125(3), 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14855

Petrova, D., Kostopoulou, O., Delaney, B. C., Cokely, E. T., & García-Retamero, R. (2018). Strengths and gaps in physicians' risk communication: A scenario study of the influence of numeracy on cancer screening communication. Medical Decision Making, 38(3), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X17729359

Regenwetter, M., Cavagnaro, D. R., Popova, A., Guo, Y., Zwilling, C., Lim, S. H., & Stevens, J. R. (2018). Heterogeneity and parsimony in intertemporal choice. Decision, 5(2), 63–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000069

Ruggeri, A., Luan, S., Keller, M., & Gummerum, M. (2018). The influence of adult and peer role models on children' and adolescents' sharing decisions. Child Development, 89(5), 1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12916