Publications of Felix Rebitschek
All genres
Journal Article (31)
2018
Journal Article
Rebitschek, F. (2018). Algorithmen kritisch hinterfragen: Gastkommentar. SV Aktuell: Informationen aus dem Gesundheitswesen / AOK Baden-Württemberg, (5), 5.
Journal Article
Wegwarth, O., , , , , Lein, I., Rebitschek, F. G., & . (2018). What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries. BMJ Open, 8, Article e023789. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023789
Journal Article
Wegwarth, O., Rebitschek, F. G., , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & . (2018). Epigenome-based cancer risk prediction: Rationale, opportunities and challenges. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 15(5), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2018.30
, , , , , , , , 2017
Journal Article
Rebitschek, F. G., Gigerenzer, G., & Wagner, G. G. (2017). Digitalisierung im Gesundheitswesen: Zwischen Datenschutz und moderner Medizinversorgung. Wirtschaftsdienst, 97(10), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-017-2200-8
, , , , , ,
Journal Article
Rebitschek, F. G. (2017). Durch #digitaleRisikokompetenz zu informierten Patient*innen. Impulse für Gesundheitsförderung, 95, 7–8.
2016
Journal Article
Gigerenzer, G., & Rebitschek, F. G. (2016). Das Jahrhundert des Patienten: Zum Umgang mit Risiken und Chancen. Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin, 92(5), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.3238/zfa.2016.0213-0219
Journal Article
McDowell, M., Rebitschek, F. G., Gigerenzer, G., & Wegwarth, O. (2016). A simple tool for communicating the benefits and harms of health interventions: A guide for creating a fact box. MDM Policy & Practice, 1, Article 2381468316665365. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468316665365
Journal Article
Rebitschek, F. G., , & (2016). The diversity effect in diagnostic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 44(5), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0592-0
2015
Journal Article
Rebitschek, F. G. (2015). Klare Kommunikation. Dr. med. Mabuse, 218, 12–13.
Journal Article
Rebitschek, F. G., , , , & (2015). Biased processing of ambiguous symptoms favors the initially leading hypothesis in sequential diagnostic reasoning. Experimental Psychology, 62(5), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000298